PENDEKATAN SISTEM UNTUK MEMAHAMI PENDEKATAN ORGANISASI: SEBUAH PERSPEKTIF UNTUK AGENDA DIAGNOSTIC READING

Authors

  • Dewi Yuliani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35880/.v9i2.4

Abstract

One of the mandatory agendas in Leadership Training in Indonesia is Diagnostic Reading, where participants
are trained to be able to analyse problems in their own organizations using appropriate metholodology.
Diagnostic Reading as a body of knowledge is originally derived from Organizational theories, thus it is imperative
to comprehend the development of Organizational Theory from the beginning to present day. The development
of modern Organizational Theory relies a lot on complexity theory and systems theory, where an organization is
seen as a system which behaves adaptively in the face of rapid changes in its environment. This paper elaborates
principles of System Theory and it relationship with complexity, characteristics of systems, and recent development
of systems approach which are widely used in various disciplines, including in Diagnostic Reading agenda. The
paper uses explanatory method to describe the use of systems approach in organizations, especially for the
purpose of analyzing problems in organizations.

References

Asproth, Viveca. et al, 2006. Complexity

Challenges of Regional Planning and Design, in

System Thinking and Complexity Science: Insight for

Action. Proceeding of the 11th ANZSYS/Managing the

complex V Conference (Christchurch, New Zealand).

ISCE Publishing, Mansfield, USA.

Checkland and Haynes, 1994. Varieties of Systems

Thinking : a Case of Soft Systems Methodology . System

Dynamics Review, Vol 10: 2-3. Cambridge.

Flynn, Patrice. 2003. Complexity Science : A

Conceptual Framework For Making Connections-

Denver. Piton Foundation, available at : www.

flynnresearch.dom.

Forrester, Jay W. 1971. Principles of Systems.

Portland : Wright-Allen Press.

Goldstein, Jeffrey. 1999. Emergence as a Construct:

Hystory and Issue, in Emergence, Vol 1(1):49-72.

Kirilyuk, A.P. 1999. Unreduced Dynamic Complexity,

Causally Complete Ecology, and Realistic Transition to

the Superior Level of Life. Report presented at the

conference “Nature, Society and History”, Vienna.

Kirilyuk, A.P. 2001. Universal Dynamic Complexity

as the Basis for Theoritic Ecology and Unified

Civilisation Transition to Creative Global Sustainability.

Report presented at The Global Change Open Science

Conference, Amsterdam.

Laegaard and Bindslev. 2006. Organizational

Theory. Ventus Publishing, downloadable at:

bookbooN.com

Lane, David C. 2001a. Rerum Cognoscere Causas:

Part I-How do the Ideas of System Dynamics Relate

to Traditional Social Theories and the Voluntarism/

Determinism Debate? in System Dynamics Review

Vol. 17(2):97-118. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Lane, David C. 2001b. Rerum Cognoscere Causas:

Part II-Opportunities Generated by the Agency/

Structure Debate and Suggestions for Clarifying the

Social Theoritic Position of System Dynamics, in System

Dynamics Review Vol. 17(4):293-309. John Wiley &

Sons, Ltd.

Mulej, Matjaz. 2005. Complexity Theory in Five

Main Systems Theory Stream, in Systems Thinking and

Complexity Science: Insight for Action. Proceeding of

the 11th ANZSYS/Managing the Complex V Conference,

Christchurch, New Zealand. ISCE publishing, Mansfield,

USA.

Neuman, W.L. 2000. Social Research Methods:

Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. Allyn and

Bacon, Boston.

OECD Report. 2009. Applications of Complexity

Science for Public Policy: New Tools for Finding

Unanticipated Consequences and Unrealized

Opportunities. Report based on OECD Global Science

Forum workshop convened on October 5-7, 2008 at

the Ettore Majorana International Centre for Scientific

Culture, Erice, Sicily.

Randers, Jorgen, ed. 1980. Elements of the

System Dynamics Method. The MIT Press, Cambridge,

Massachusetts.

Reynolds, P. D.1971. A Primer In Theory

Construction. Macmillan, New York.

Richmond, Barry. 1994. Systems thinking/system

dynamics : let’s just get on with it. Systems Dynamic

Review Vol. 10 nos 2-3, John Wiley & Sons.

Saeed, Khalid. 1986. Minds Over Methods. In

System Dynamics Review 2(2):150-156. System

Dynamics Society.

Schon, Donald A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner:

How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, USA.

Senge, Peter M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The

Art & Practice of The Learning Organization, Currency

and Doubleday, New York.

Sterman, John D. (2000), Business Dynamics,

Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World.

The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc, Boston.

Vazquez, Margarita dan Liz, Manuel. 2005. System

Dynamics and Philosophy: A Constructivist and

Expressivist Approach. Universidad La Laguna, Santa

Cruz de Tenerife, Espana.

Yang, Chun-Xia, et.al. 2013. Organization Theories:

From Classical to Modern. Journal of Applied Sciences

(21): 4470-4476. Asian Network for Scientific

Organization.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-06

How to Cite

Yuliani, D. (2018). PENDEKATAN SISTEM UNTUK MEMAHAMI PENDEKATAN ORGANISASI: SEBUAH PERSPEKTIF UNTUK AGENDA DIAGNOSTIC READING. Jurnal Inspirasi, 9(2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.35880/.v9i2.4

Citation Check