Analisis Bibliometriks dan Visual terkait Corporate Entrepreneurship menggunakan VOSviewer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35880/inspirasi.v12i2.218Keywords:
Corporate Entrepreneurship, bibliometric, VOSViewer, scopusAbstract
ABSTRACT
This study aims to analyze the scope of corporate entrepreneurship research using a bibliometric review. To obtain information about the study of corporate entrepreneurship, the Scopus database is used. Topic areas with titles, keywords, and abstract criteria in the study of corporate entrepreneurship are used as a reference for extracting search results. Extraction of search results is done using VOSviewer. After that, the results of the bibliometric mapping were analyzed further. A total of 938 articles were found in Scopus da tabase accessed on July 25, 2021. There was a significant increase in the number of publications on corporate entrepreneurship from 2019 to 2020. Among all countries, America contributed the most publications. Meanwhile, the keywords corporate entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship, corporate venturing and dynamic capabilities turned out to be the most talked about topics. Through VOSViewer we analyze how many articles have been published on corporate entrepreneurship and its relationship to a topic. This review can certainly provide a reference point for further research related to corporate entrepreneurship.
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis ruang lingkup penelitian corporate entrepreneurship menggunakan tinjauan bibliometrik. Untuk mendapatkan informasi tentang kajian corporate entrepreneurship, digunakan database Scopus. Area topik dengan judul, kata kunci, dan kriteria abstrak dalam kajian corporate entrepreneurship digunakan sebagai acuan penggalian hasil pencarian. Ekstraksi hasil pencarian dilakukan dengan menggunakan VOSviewer. Setelah itu, hasil pemetaan bibliometrik dianalisis lebih lanjut. Sebanyak 938 artikel ditemukan di Scopus da tabase yang diakses pada 25 Juli 2021. Ada peningkatan signifikan jumlah publikasi tentang corporate entrepreneurship dari 2019 ke 2020. Di antara semua negara, Amerika berkontribusi paling banyak publikasi. Sementara itu, kata kunci corporate entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship, corporate venturing dan dynamic capabilities ternyata menjadi topik yang paling banyak dibicarakan. Melalui VOSViewer kami menganalisis berapa banyak artikel yang telah diterbitkan tentang corporate entrepreneurship dan hubungannya dengan suatu topik. Ulasan ini tentunya dapat memberikan titik referensi untuk penelitian lebih lanjut terkait corporate entrepreneurship.
References
Abadli, R.; Kooli, C.; Otmani, A. Entrepreneurial culture and promotion of exporting in Algerian SMEs: Perception, reality and challenges. Int. J. Entrepreneurship Small Bus. 2020, 41, 227–240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2020.109933
Bae, J.T.; Cha, M.S. Recent trend in entrepreneurship and venture management research: A comparative analysis of Korean and American journals (1998–2004). J. Small Bus. Innov. 2005, 8, 57–94.
Blank, S.; Andreessen, M.; Ho_man, R.; Sahlman, W.A. HBR’s 10 Must Reads on Entrepreneurship and Startups; HBR Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 1–159. Available online: https://moodle2.units.it/pluginfile.php/287259/mod_resource/content/1/HBR_readings_underlined.pdf (accessed on 22 September 2020).
Cabeza, L.F.; Chàfer, M.; Mata, É. Comparative Analysis of Web of Science and Scopus on the Energy Efficiency and Climate Impact of Buildings. Energies 2020, 13, 409.
http://doi.org/10.3390/en13020409
Covin, J.G.; Slevin, D.P. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments.Strat. Manag. J. 1989, 10, 75–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100107
Dess, G.G.; Ireland, R.D.; Zahra, S.A.; Floyd, S.W.; Janney, J.J.; Lane, P.J. Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. J. Manage. 2003, 29, 351–378.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00015-1
Diodato, V.P. Dictionary of Bibliometrics; The Haworth Press: New York, NY, USA, 1994; pp. 1–168.
Drucker, P.F. Innovation and Entrepreneurship; Harper and Row: New York, NY, USA, 1985. Available online: https://www.pdfdrive.com/drucker-1985-innovation-and-e-d29476399.html (accessed on 22 September 2020).
Fairthorne, R.A. Empirical hyperbolic distributions (Bradford-Zipf-Mandelbrot) for bibliometric description and prediction. J. Doc. 1969, 25, 319–343. http://doi.org/10.1108/eb026481
Gartner, W.B. A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture
creation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1985, 10, 696–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4279094
Guth, W.D.; Ginsberg, A. Guest editors’ introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship. Strateg. Manag. J. 1990,11, 5–15.
Hawkins, D.T. Unconventional uses of on-line information retrieval systems: On-line bibliometric studies. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1977, 28, 13–18. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630280103
Hill, S.A.; Georgoulas, S. Internal Corporate Venturing: A Review of Five-Decades of Literature; Handbook of Research on Corporate Entrepreneurship, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2016; pp. 13–63. Available online: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781785368721/9781785368721.00007. xml (accessed on 22 September 2020).
http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781785368738.00007
Ireland, R.D.; Covin, J.G.; Kuratko, D.F. Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2009, 33, 19–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00279.x
Kuratko, D.F.; Audretsch, D.B. Clarifying the domains of corporate entrepreneurship. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2013, 9, 323–335.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0257-4
Kuratko, D.F.; Hornsby, J.S.; Hayton, J. Corporate entrepreneurship: The innovative challenge for a new global economic reality. Small Bus. Econ. 2015, 45, 245–253.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11365-013-0257-4
Lee, J.Y.; Park, T.K. The nonlinear relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and performance: The moderating e_ect of absorptive capacity. J. Bus. Res. 2017, 32, 147–175.
Liao, H.; Tang, M.; Luo, L.; Li, C.; Chiclana, F.; Zeng, X.J. A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research. Sustainability 2018, 10, 166. http://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166
Lumpkin, G.T.; Dess, G.G. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking It to performance.Acad. Manag. Rev. 1996, 21, 135–172.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
Miller, D. The Correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Manag. Sci. 1983, 29, 770–791.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
Narayanan, V.; Yang, Y.; Zahra, S.A. Corporate venturing and value creation: A review and proposed framework. Res. Policy 2009, 38, 58–76.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.015
Pritchard, A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. J. Doc. 1969, 25, 348–349.
Pritchard, A.;Wittig, G.R. Bibliometrics: A Bibliography and Index; ALLM Books: Watford, UK, 1981; pp. 3–8.
Schumpeter, J.A. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy; Harper and Brothers: New York, NY, USA, 1942.
Sharma, P.; Chrisman, J.J. Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrep. Theory Pr. 1999, 23, 11–28.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104225879902300302
Silva, E.G.; Teixeira, A.A. Surveying structural change: Seminal contributions and a bibliometric account. Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. 2008, 19, 273–300. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2008.02.001
Wang, J.; Liu, Z. A bibliometric analysis on rural studies in human geography and related disciplines. Scientometrics 2014, 101, 39–59. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1388-2
White, H.D.; McCain, K.W. Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 1998, 49, 327–355.
Wuni, I.Y.; Shen, Q.; Osei-Kyei, R. Scientometric review of global research trends on green buildings in construction journals from 1992 to 2018. Energy Build. 2019, 190, 69–85.
