Efektivitas Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2022 dalam Mencegah Kasus Kekerasan dan Pelecehan Seksual di Kota Bandung
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35880/inspirasi.v14i1.2316Keywords:
Brand Awareness; Online Customer Review; Purchase IntentionAbstract
In Indonesia, efforts related to the launch and adoption of e-Governance initiatives have been made in various fields. However, so far most of these efforts have not achieved the expected results over a longer period. This has led to underutilization of public funds. In addition, there are variations in the adoption and success of e-Governance initiatives across Indonesia, mainly due to prevalent diversity. The implementation of good governance principles in BPJS Health services was measured based on a sample of 50 respondents of BPJS Health service users at Cinunuk Health Center, then analyzed using the Rasch Model. The method applied in this research is a quantitative approach, so the application of nonexperimental is used in this research. Primary data was obtained through a questionnaire design and distributed online with the help of the google form application. The purpose of this study is to identify the factors responsible for higher adoption of e-Governance services in Indonesia. This research will also analyze the impact of the ongoing pandemic on e-Governance adoption by including a separate construct related to healthcare.
ABSTRAK
Di Indonesia, upaya terkait peluncuran dan adopsi inisiatif e-Governance telah dilakukan dalam berbagai bidang. Namun, sejauh ini sebagian besar upaya tersebut belum mencapai hasil yang diharapkan dalam periode yang lebih panjang. Hal ini menyebabkan kurangnya pemanfaatan dana publik. Selain itu, terdapat variasi dalam adopsi dan keberhasilan inisiatif e-Governance di seluruh wilayah Indonesia, terutama karena adanya keragaman yang prevalen. Implementasi prinsip good governance dalam pelayanan BPJS Kesehatan diukur berdasarkan sampel sebanyak 50 responden para pengguna layanan BPJS Kesehatan di Puskesmas Cinunuk, lalu dianalisis menggunakan Model Rasch. Metode yang diaplikasikan dalam penelitian ini ialah pendekatan kuantitatif, sehingga penerapan nonexperimental digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Data primer diperoleh melalui rancangan kuesioner dan disebarkan secara online dengan bantuan aplikasi google form. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang bertanggung jawab atas adopsi layanan e-Governance yang lebih tinggi di Indonesia. Penelitian ini juga akan menganalisis dampak pandemi yang sedang berlangsung terhadap adopsi e-Governance dengan memasukkan konstruk terpisah yang terkait dengan pelayanan kesehatan.
References
Abbott, J., & Touchton, M. (2023). Designing democracy: How does institutional structure affect civic participation? Governance, 36(3), 843–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12710
Achmad, M. (2022). The Governments’ Use of Social Networking Sites (SNS) to Promote Citizens’ Trust During the COVID-19: Perceived Religious Values as a Moderator. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 9(4), 156–186. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1383
Bokhari, S. A. A., & Myeong, S. (2022). Artificial Intelligence-Based Technological-Oriented Knowledge Management, Innovation, and E-Service Delivery in Smart Cities: Moderating Role of E-Governance. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178732
Caloghirou, Y., Protogerou, A., & Panagiotopoulos, P. (2016). Public procurement for innovation: A novel eGovernment services scheme in Greek local authorities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.016
Casey, C. (2016). Nonprofit Organizations in Governance Arrangements: Adding Democratic Value to Community Reinvestment Act Agreements? Public Integrity, 18(3), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2016.1139529
Clopton, Z. D. (2015). Transnational class actions in the shadow of preclusion. Indiana Law Journal, 90(4), 1388–1428. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84940704826&partnerID=40&md5=043590ba0cb9b5d2548b3d849ba83bec
Dobrolyubova, E. (2021). Measuring outcomes of digital transformation in public administration: Literature review and possible steps forward. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0003
Duhamel, F. B., Gutiérrez-Martínez, I., Cordova-Díaz, H., & Cue-Funes, S. (2023). Determinants of adoption of IS-based service innovations in government to create public value. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17(2), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-10-2021-0159
Hafner, M., Breu, R., Agreiter, B., & Nowak, A. (2006). Sectet: An extensible framework for the realization of secure inter-organizational workflows. Internet Research, 16(5), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240610710978
Hall, A. R. (2015). Drones: Public Interest, Public Choice, and the Expansion of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 21(2), 273–300. https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2014-0043
Hariguna, T., & Ruangkanjanases, A. (2021). Public behavior as an output of e-government service: the role of new technology integrated in e-government and antecedent of relationship quality. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137464
Hermanto, B., & Miftahuddin, A. (2021). Tourism experience in Indonesia: A new approach using the rasch model scale. Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 38(4), 1051–1056. https://doi.org/10.30892/GTG.38409-743
Hutahaean, M., Eunike, I. J., & Silalahi, A. D. K. (2023). Do Social Media, Good Governance, and Public Trust Increase Citizens’ e-Government Participation? Dual Approach of PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9988602
Jessen, R., Metzing, M., & Rostam-Afschar, D. (2022). Optimal Taxation When the Tax Burden Matters. FinanzArchiv, 78(3), 312–341. https://doi.org/10.1628/fa-2022-0004
Kang, K. E., & Lee, K. (2023). Collaboration and Public Participation for Municipal Growth in Land Economic Development Projects. Economic Development Quarterly, 37(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912424231159046
Li, J., Xiong, W., Casady, C. B., Liu, B., & Wang, F. (2023). Advancing Urban Sustainability through Public-Private Partnerships: Case Study of the Gu’An New Industry City in China. Journal of Management in Engineering, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0001103
Madyatmadja, E. D., Prabowo, H., & Kosala, R. (2017). IT Governance in digital era in Jakarta Provincial Government. Proceedings of 2016 International Conference on Information Management and Technology, ICIMTech 2016, 155–158. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech.2016.7930321
Michele, B. (2023). How social profiles influence community entrepreneurs’ capacity to develop networks. A Bourdieuan perspective on Italian community co-operatives. Community Development Journal, 58(2), 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsab043
Miftahuddin, A., Hermanto, B., Raharja, S. J., & Chan, A. (2020). City brand attractiveness on tourism using rasch model approach. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 150–156. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85085379587&partnerID=40&md5=6559f1383021d7fe2fd21f5f1afaaa79
Nie, L., Oldenburg, B., Cao, Y., & Ren, W. (2023). Continuous usage intention of mobile health services: model construction and validation. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09393-9
Prochaska, S., Duskin, K., Kharazian, Z., Minow, C., Blucker, S., Venuto, S., West, J. D., & Starbird, K. (2023). Mobilizing Manufactured Reality: How Participatory Disinformation Shaped Deep Stories to Catalyze Action during the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CSCW1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3579616
Rukanova, B., van Engelenburg, S., Ubacht, J., Tan, Y.-H., Geurts, M., Sies, M., Molenhuis, M., Slegt, M., & van Dijk, D. (2023). Public value creation through voluntary business to government information sharing enabled by digital infrastructure innovations: a framework for analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101786
Sadashivam, T. (2010). A New Paradigm in Governance: Is It True for E-Governance? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1(4), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-010-0018-3
Saikia, B. (2019). New mode of governance: Governance through technology. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 4052–4055. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C5392.098319
Saleh, L., Parker, G., Stevenson, M., & Miller, F. A. (2023). A comparative analysis of non-invasive prenatal testing in Ontario and Quebec: the role of governing style in health technology innovation & adoption. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09245-6
Saxena, D., Muzellec, L., & McDonagh, J. (2022). From Bureaucracy to Citizen-Centricity: How the Citizen-Journey Should Inform the Digital Transformation of Public Services. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.305230
Schwengerer, L. (2021). Online Intellectual Virtues and the Extended Mind. Social Epistemology, 35(3), 312–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2020.1815095
Slattery, C., Tazhitdinova, A., & Robinson, S. (2023). Corporate political spending and state tax policy: Evidence from Citizens United. Journal of Public Economics, 221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104859
Tomor, Z., Meijer, A., Michels, A., & Geertman, S. (2019). Smart Governance For Sustainable Cities: Findings from a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(4), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.1651178
Turner, P., & Higgs, G. (2003). The use and management of geographic information in local e-government in the UK. Information Polity, 8(3–4), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-2003-0037
Whitely, P. F., & Seyd, P. (1996). Rationality and party activism: Encompassing tests of alternative models of political participation. European Journal of Political Research, 29(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1996.tb00649.x
Xu, C. K., & Tang, T. (2020). Closing the Gap or Widening the Divide: The Impacts of Technology-Enabled Coproduction on Equity in Public Service Delivery. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 962–975. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13222
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Inspirasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
